Author name: admin

In Australia, ongoing controversies have emerged around taxi club insurers and insurance-like schemes that fail to pay claims, particularly in Victoria where regulatory gaps allow unlicensed providers to operate. Several taxi and rideshare clubs market themselves as offering “insurance”, yet many do not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) required for regulated insurance businesses. This has left hundreds of drivers and third parties without adequate compensation after accidents, with claims delayed or denied and legal battles ensuing. Critics argue that these clubs exploit legislative loopholes by structuring as incorporated associations, selling discretionary coverages rather than formal insurance. This means they can pick and choose when to pay, often imposing high excesses or ignoring claims entirely, leaving drivers personally liable for damages. Some drivers have faced court action and substantial debts after clubs failed to settle third-party claims, despite members believing they were covered. Regulators like ASIC and APRA have been criticised for inaction, despite the requirement for licencing, while consumer advocates call for stronger enforcement and clear disclosure that such coverages are not standard insurance. The controversies highlight systemic risks in taxi industry insurance and ongoing calls for reform and regulatory action to protect drivers and other motorists. Taxi or Rideshare Club deny your claim? Contact TP Claims – we can help – No Win No Fee

If you have been injured at work, you may be entitled to make a claim, but the first step is understanding what type of claim applies to your situation. In Australia, most workplace injuries are covered by the workers’ compensation scheme in your state or territory. You may have a workers’ compensation claim if your injury occurred while performing your job, during a work-related activity, or as a result of your employment duties. This includes physical injuries, psychological injuries, and conditions that develop over time, such as repetitive strain injuries. To work out if you have a claim, consider whether there is a clear connection between your work and the injury. Ask yourself: did the injury happen at work or because of work? Was your employer notified? Have you sought medical treatment and obtained a medical certificate stating the injury is work-related? In some cases, you may also have a common law or personal injury claim, particularly if your injury was caused by employer negligence or unsafe work practices. This type of claim is separate from workers’ compensation and may allow you to seek damages for pain and suffering or loss of future earnings. Because strict time limits apply, it is important to report the injury promptly and seek legal advice to understand your rights and options. Injured at a workplace and not your fault ? Contact TP Claims for a no obligation enquiry with our legal panel. No win no fee.

In New South Wales (NSW), shopping centre car parks are classified as shared pedestrian zones where a maximum speed limit of 10 km/h applies. This low limit is designed to prioritize pedestrian safety, given the high foot traffic in such areas. Drivers must yield to pedestrians and strictly observe this limit, as enforced by NSW road rules. Some private car parks may display lower advisory speed limits, such as 5 km/h, but these are not legally enforceable. The 10 km/h speed limit ensures a safer environment for pedestrians and vehicles to coexist safely within these zones. In contrast, Victorian regulations allow shopping centre operators more discretion over speed limits within their car parks since these are often considered private property. The Victorian Road Safety Road Rules 2017 include provisions for low-speed limits in pedestrian priority areas like car parks, typically recommending limits of 10 or 20 km/h, but there is no strict mandated limit for all shopping centre car parks statewide. The official state default urban speed limit outside private car parks is 50 km/h. Victoria also uses 40 km/h limits in high pedestrian activity areas such as shopping strips, but not uniformly inside car parks unless specified by local authorities or facility managers. Thus, NSW mandates a strict 10 km/h limit in shopping centre car parks recognizing them as shared zones, whereas Victorian rules offer flexibility, often guided by operator discretion, with recommended limits usually between 10 and 20 km/h to ensure pedestrian safety. Car accident not your fault? Contact TP Claims. We are here to help. No win no fee.

In New South Wales, road markings are essential for regulating traffic flow and ensuring road safety. Understanding what each type of line means—and whether you can cross it—is vital for all drivers.

According to Victorian road rules, a single continuous (solid) line generally means you must not cross or overtake i

Collisions with Parked Cars: Liability and CCTV Evidence Collisions involving parked cars are a common type of road incident, often occurring in residential streets, shopping centres, or tight parking areas. In most cases, the driver who hits a parked vehicle is at fault, especially if the parked car was stationary, legally parked, and clearly visible. However, complications can arise when visibility is poor, the parked car was in a no-stopping zone, or both parties are not present when the accident occurs. The at-fault driver is legally required to leave their details — including name, contact number, and registration — even if the owner of the parked vehicle is not around. Failing to do so can result in a hit-and-run charge under traffic laws. Obtaining CCTV footage can be crucial when liability is disputed or when a driver leaves the scene. Neighbours with security cameras or doorbell footage may provide useful evidence. It’s advisable to ask politely, explaining the situation. If they decline, police may be able to request footage formally during an investigation. Documenting the scene with photos and contacting your insurer quickly can also assist with your claim. Prompt action can make the difference in proving fault and recovering damages. Car accident not your fault? Contact TP Claims online or call now. No win no fee. https://red-scorpion-359237.hostingersite.com/contact/  

As automated driving systems (ADS) become increasingly integrated into modern vehicles, the question of who is ethically and legally responsible in the event of a collision remains complex. Traditional liability models focus on driver negligence, but autonomous technology blurs this line. When an ADS causes an accident, responsibility may shift between the human driver, the AI software company, and the vehicle manufacturer. If the driver was not actively controlling the vehicle or had limited control, holding them fully liable raises ethical concerns—particularly if the system gave misleading instructions or failed to alert them. Conversely, blaming the AI software company involves proving a flaw in design, coding, or data processing, which can be difficult without full access to proprietary systems. Vehicle manufacturers, meanwhile, may be liable if the integration of the system was defective or inadequate in safety oversight. Ethically, there is a growing call for shared liability models that reflect the distributed nature of control in autonomous vehicles. Transparency in system performance and data-sharing is essential to assess fault fairly. Ultimately, as technology evolves, legal frameworks must adapt to ensure that liability reflects actual responsibility, rather than simply placing blame on the most accessible party. Car accident not your fault? At fault driver and/or their insurer won’t pay? Contact TP Claims – we can help No Win No Fee. https://red-scorpion-359237.hostingersite.com/contact/    

As automated driving technology advances, the nature of car collisions and traffic safety is undergoing a major transformation

Multi-car pileups on freeways are chaotic and often result in significant damage, injuries, and even fatalities. Determining liability in such complex accidents can be a daunting task, requiring careful analysis of the events leading up to the collision. One of the key factors in determining liability is establishing the sequence of events. This involves understanding how the initial collision occurred and how subsequent vehicles became involved. Factors such as weather conditions, road visibility, and driver behaviour play crucial roles in this analysis. Another important aspect is assessing each driver’s actions leading up to the accident. Were there any instances of reckless driving, speeding, or sudden lane changes? Eyewitness accounts, surveillance footage, and vehicle data recorders (if available) can provide valuable insights into driver behaviour. Liability may also be influenced by external factors such as road conditions and signage. Poorly maintained roads, inadequate signage, or construction zones can contribute to accidents and may shift liability to responsible authorities or entities. Claim managers, insurance companies and legal experts often work together to determine liability in multi-car pileups, considering all available evidence and applicable laws. Comparative negligence laws, which allocate fault based on each party’s degree of responsibility, may also come into play. In conclusion, determining liability in multi-car pileups on freeways requires a comprehensive investigation considering various factors such as sequence of events, driver behaviour, road conditions, and applicable laws. Collaboration between drivers, claim managers, insurance companies, legal professionals, and authorities is essential in ensuring fair and accurate assessments of liability. Car accident not your fault? Call TP Claims – we are here to help. https://red-scorpion-359237.hostingersite.com/contact/